VI Mityng pamięci Andrzeja Mera - indywiduel 303: T Laszczak | ||||||||||||
runda | przeciwnicy | rozd. | linia | kont rakt | gra | wist | lew | zapis | % | wynik bieżący | ||
NS | WE | |||||||||||
1 | S Kopyt-L Sadoś,K Krajewski-* | 5 | WE | 4× | E | 4 | = | +590 | 97.22% | 97.22% | ||
S Kopyt-K Krajewski,*-L Sadoś | 6 | WE | 4× | S | A | -1 | +100 | 38.89% | 68.06% | |||
2 | W Burakowski-W Sienkiewicz,W Jabłoński-* | 13 | WE | 3 | W | 10 | +1 | +630 | 70.53% | 68.88% | ||
W Burakowski-W Jabłoński,*-W Sienkiewicz | 14 | WE | 4× | E | 5 | -3 | -500 | 0.00% | 51.66% | |||
3 | B Mer-J Roszczenko,M Urwanowicz-* | 21 | WE | 3 | W | A | = | +110 | 33.33% | 47.99% | ||
B Mer-M Urwanowicz,*-J Roszczenko | 22 | WE | 4× | W | A | +1 | +990 | 91.67% | 55.27% | |||
4 | T Zaleski-A Balunowski,H Stecewicz-* | 29 | WE | 3 | S | A | = | -600 | 5.56% | 48.17% | ||
T Zaleski-H Stecewicz,*-A Balunowski | 30 | WE | 5 | E | K | = | +450 | 75.00% | 51.52% | |||
5 | J Gąsiorowski-D Kozłowski,Z Kowalewski-* | 37 | WE | 3× | E | 3 | -5 | -1100 | 0.00% | 45.80% | ||
J Gąsiorowski-Z Kowalewski,*-D Kozłowski | 38 | WE | 5× | N | K | -3 | +500 | 25.00% | 43.72% | |||
6 | M Bartoszewski-J Pęczkowski,R Kruk-* | 7 | WE | 6 | W | 8 | = | +1440 | 55.56% | 44.80% | ||
M Bartoszewski-R Kruk,*-J Pęczkowski | 8 | WE | 3 | W | K | +2 | +150 | 86.11% | 48.24% | |||
7 | S Juchnicki-H Brodawski,G Szarkanas-* | 15 | WE | 3 | N | 2 | +1 | -630 | 8.33% | 45.17% | ||
S Juchnicki-G Szarkanas,*-H Brodawski | 16 | WE | 1 | E | 2 | -2 | -200 | 38.89% | 44.72% | |||
8 | S Młynarczuk-J Galewski,B Szulejewski-* | 23 | WE | 3 | E | 5 | = | +600 | 100.00% | 48.41% | ||
S Młynarczuk-B Szulejewski,*-J Galewski | 24 | WE | 3 | N | 5 | -1 | +50 | 41.67% | 47.98% | |||
9 | S Bolesta-W Miłuński,H Medusheuski-* | 31 | WE | 4 | S | 4 | -1 | +100 | 91.67% | 50.55% | ||
S Bolesta-H Medusheuski,*-W Miłuński | 32 | WE | 3 | E | 9 | = | +140 | 52.78% | 50.68% | |||
10 | L Hejne-Y Hardzei,D Hutnik-* | 1 | WE | 5× | W | Q | -1 | -100 | 76.39% | 52.03% | ||
L Hejne-D Hutnik,*-Y Hardzei | 2 | WE | 3 | S | 2 | = | -110 | 25.00% | 50.68% | |||
11 | L Rutkowski-M Hryszko,Ł Sobkiewicz-* | 9 | WE | 5× | S | A | = | -650 | 0.00% | 48.27% | ||
L Rutkowski-Ł Sobkiewicz,*-M Hryszko | 10 | WE | 2 | S | J | = | -110 | 41.67% | 47.97% | |||
12 | T Paluchowski-A Chayeuski,A Tompolska-* | 17 | WE | 3 | S | 6 | = | -140 | 5.56% | 46.12% | ||
T Paluchowski-A Tompolska,*-A Chayeuski | 18 | WE | 3 | S | A | -3 | +300 | 97.22% | 48.25% | |||
13 | P Latała-I Radziukevich,J Bojanowski-* | 25 | WE | 2 | W | K | +1 | +140 | 38.89% | 47.88% | ||
P Latała-J Bojanowski,*-I Radziukevich | 26 | WE | 6 | W | 6 | +1 | +1460 | 94.44% | 49.67% | |||
14 | J Gardocki-W Nazaruk,H Perkowska-* | 33 | WE | 4 | N | 6 | +1 | -450 | 52.78% | 49.78% | ||
J Gardocki-H Perkowska,*-W Nazaruk | 34 | WE | 3 | N | 2 | = | -600 | 2.78% | 48.10% | |||
15 | *-R Kozłowski,J Kowalewski-S Pochodowicz | 3 | NS | 3 | E | J | +1 | -630 | 66.67% | 48.74% | ||
*-S Pochodowicz,J Kowalewski-R Kozłowski | 4 | NS | 3× | N | 3 | -1 | -200 | 5.56% | 47.30% | |||
16 | *-J Romot,M Hanusz-O Gradovski | 11 | NS | 4 | N | Q | +1 | +450 | 86.11% | 48.56% | ||
*-M Hanusz,O Gradovski-J Romot | 12 | NS | 3× | E | K | -2 | +300 | 55.56% | 48.78% | |||
17 | *-K Sawwa,T Banach-N Mer | 19 | NS | 2 | S | 7 | -2 | -100 | 11.11% | 47.63% | ||
*-T Banach,N Mer-K Sawwa | 20 | NS | 4 | S | Q | +1 | +650 | 86.11% | 48.77% | |||
18 | *-J Firs,M Krasowski-J Bojaryn | 27 | NS | APP | 60.00% | 49.09% | ||||||
*-M Krasowski,J Bojaryn-J Firs | 28 | NS | 3 | N | 2 | -3 | -300 | 0.00% | 47.72% | |||
19 | *-J Łosiak,P Klebanovich-A Koda | 35 | NS | 3 | E | 4 | +1 | -630 | 8.33% | 46.66% | ||
*-P Klebanovich,A Koda-J Łosiak | 36 | NS | 3× | E | 10 | = | -730 | 0.00% | 45.43% | |||
SUMA: | 45.43% | |||||||||||
±: | ||||||||||||
WYNIK: | 45.43% | |||||||||||
MIEJSCE: | 64 |
Pary.4.1.0.23 ©Jan Romański'2005, strona wygenerowana 2016-10-23 o 17:15:39