VI Mityng pamięci Andrzeja Mera - indywiduel 305: J Kunicki | ||||||||||||
runda | przeciwnicy | rozd. | linia | kont rakt | gra | wist | lew | zapis | % | wynik bieżący | ||
NS | WE | |||||||||||
1 | S Młynarczuk-J Roszczenko,W Jabłoński-* | 9 | WE | 3× | N | 5 | -1 | +100 | 77.78% | 77.78% | ||
S Młynarczuk-W Jabłoński,*-J Roszczenko | 10 | WE | 2 | N | 5 | = | -110 | 41.67% | 59.72% | |||
2 | S Bolesta-A Balunowski,M Urwanowicz-* | 17 | WE | 3 | S | 4 | -1 | +50 | 66.67% | 62.04% | ||
S Bolesta-M Urwanowicz,*-A Balunowski | 18 | WE | 2 | E | 4 | = | +120 | 75.00% | 65.28% | |||
3 | L Hejne-D Kozłowski,H Stecewicz-* | 25 | WE | 1 | N | 2 | -1 | +50 | 19.44% | 56.11% | ||
L Hejne-H Stecewicz,*-D Kozłowski | 26 | WE | 2 | W | 2 | +5 | +260 | 22.22% | 50.46% | |||
4 | L Rutkowski-J Pęczkowski,Z Kowalewski-* | 33 | WE | 4 | N | 4 | +2 | -480 | 2.78% | 43.65% | ||
L Rutkowski-Z Kowalewski,*-J Pęczkowski | 34 | WE | 3 | N | 7 | -3 | +300 | 94.44% | 50.00% | |||
5 | T Paluchowski-H Brodawski,R Kruk-* | 3 | WE | 3 | E | Q | +3 | +690 | 88.89% | 54.32% | ||
T Paluchowski-R Kruk,*-H Brodawski | 4 | WE | 3 | W | 9 | = | +110 | 38.89% | 52.78% | |||
6 | P Latała-J Galewski,G Szarkanas-* | 11 | WE | 4 | W | K | = | +130 | 88.89% | 56.06% | ||
P Latała-G Szarkanas,*-J Galewski | 12 | WE | 4 | W | 8 | -2 | -100 | 86.11% | 58.56% | |||
7 | J Gardocki-W Miłuński,B Szulejewski-* | 19 | WE | 4 | N | 9 | = | -420 | 25.00% | 55.98% | ||
J Gardocki-B Szulejewski,*-W Miłuński | 20 | WE | 4 | N | Q | +1 | -650 | 13.89% | 52.98% | |||
8 | J Kowalewski-Y Hardzei,H Medusheuski-* | 27 | WE | 3 | N | 4 | -3 | +150 | 88.11% | 55.32% | ||
J Kowalewski-H Medusheuski,*-Y Hardzei | 28 | WE | 2 | N | A | = | -110 | 0.00% | 51.86% | |||
9 | M Hanusz-M Hryszko,D Hutnik-* | 35 | WE | 5 | W | 2 | -2 | -200 | 0.00% | 48.81% | ||
M Hanusz-D Hutnik,*-M Hryszko | 36 | WE | 2 | E | 10 | = | +110 | 52.78% | 49.03% | |||
10 | T Banach-A Chayeuski,Ł Sobkiewicz-* | 5 | WE | 4 | E | 9 | = | +420 | 80.56% | 50.69% | ||
T Banach-Ł Sobkiewicz,*-A Chayeuski | 6 | WE | 2 | W | J | = | +110 | 55.56% | 50.93% | |||
11 | M Krasowski-I Radziukevich,A Tompolska-* | 13 | WE | 3 | E | 9 | = | +600 | 26.56% | 49.77% | ||
M Krasowski-A Tompolska,*-I Radziukevich | 14 | WE | 3 | N | 6 | +1 | -430 | 44.44% | 49.53% | |||
12 | P Klebanovich-W Nazaruk,J Bojanowski-* | 21 | WE | 3 | W | A | +1 | +130 | 58.33% | 49.91% | ||
P Klebanovich-J Bojanowski,*-W Nazaruk | 22 | WE | 4× | W | K | +1 | +990 | 91.67% | 51.65% | |||
13 | S Kopyt-S Pochodowicz,H Perkowska-* | 29 | WE | 2 | S | 10 | +1 | -140 | 47.22% | 51.48% | ||
S Kopyt-H Perkowska,*-S Pochodowicz | 30 | WE | 5 | S | 2 | -1 | +50 | 22.22% | 50.35% | |||
14 | W Burakowski-O Gradovski,R Kozłowski-* | 37 | WE | 4 | N | Q | +2 | -680 | 11.11% | 48.90% | ||
W Burakowski-R Kozłowski,*-O Gradovski | 38 | WE | 6 | E | 2 | = | +1430 | 88.89% | 50.33% | |||
15 | *-J Romot,B Mer-N Mer | 7 | NS | 6 | E | 10 | = | -1430 | 66.67% | 50.89% | ||
*-B Mer,N Mer-J Romot | 8 | NS | 3 | N | 3 | -1 | -50 | 75.00% | 51.69% | |||
16 | *-K Sawwa,T Zaleski-J Bojaryn | 15 | NS | 3 | S | 2 | +1 | +630 | 91.67% | 52.98% | ||
*-T Zaleski,J Bojaryn-K Sawwa | 16 | NS | 2 | N | 7 | +1 | +110 | 38.89% | 52.54% | |||
17 | *-J Firs,J Gąsiorowski-A Koda | 23 | NS | 1 | E | 5 | +1 | -120 | 16.67% | 51.45% | ||
*-J Gąsiorowski,A Koda-J Firs | 24 | NS | 4 | S | A | -3 | -150 | 8.33% | 50.19% | |||
18 | *-J Łosiak,M Bartoszewski-L Sadoś | 31 | NS | 4 | E | K | -1 | +50 | 22.22% | 49.39% | ||
*-M Bartoszewski,L Sadoś-J Łosiak | 32 | NS | 3 | W | A | = | -140 | 47.22% | 49.33% | |||
19 | *-K Krajewski,S Juchnicki-W Sienkiewicz | 1 | NS | 4 | N | K | = | +420 | 93.97% | 50.53% | ||
*-S Juchnicki,W Sienkiewicz-K Krajewski | 2 | NS | 3 | E | 5 | = | -110 | 16.67% | 49.64% | |||
SUMA: | 49.64% | |||||||||||
±: | ||||||||||||
WYNIK: | 49.64% | |||||||||||
MIEJSCE: | 41 |
Pary.4.1.0.23 ©Jan Romański'2005, strona wygenerowana 2016-10-23 o 17:15:39