VI Mityng pamięci Andrzeja Mera - indywiduel 318: E Shokhan | ||||||||||||
runda | przeciwnicy | rozd. | linia | kont rakt | gra | wist | lew | zapis | % | wynik bieżący | ||
NS | WE | |||||||||||
1 | M Bartoszewski-O Gradovski,J Firs-* | 35 | WE | 3 | W | 3 | = | +110 | 27.78% | 27.78% | ||
M Bartoszewski-J Firs,*-O Gradovski | 36 | WE | 2 | E | 10 | +1 | +140 | 72.22% | 50.00% | |||
2 | S Juchnicki-N Mer,J Łosiak-* | 5 | WE | 3 | E | Q | +2 | +200 | 47.22% | 49.07% | ||
S Juchnicki-J Łosiak,*-N Mer | 6 | WE | 2 | W | J | +1 | +140 | 77.78% | 56.25% | |||
3 | S Młynarczuk-J Bojaryn,K Krajewski-* | 13 | WE | 3 | E | 10 | +1 | +630 | 70.53% | 59.11% | ||
S Młynarczuk-K Krajewski,*-J Bojaryn | 14 | WE | 3 | N | 5 | +1 | -430 | 44.44% | 56.66% | |||
4 | S Bolesta-A Koda,W Jabłoński-* | 21 | WE | 3 | N | A | -1 | +100 | 25.00% | 52.14% | ||
S Bolesta-W Jabłoński,*-A Koda | 22 | WE | 4 | W | A | +1 | +650 | 58.33% | 52.91% | |||
5 | L Hejne-L Sadoś,M Urwanowicz-* | 29 | WE | 4 | S | K | -1 | +100 | 69.44% | 54.75% | ||
L Hejne-M Urwanowicz,*-L Sadoś | 30 | WE | 6× | S | 3 | -2 | +300 | 58.33% | 55.11% | |||
6 | L Rutkowski-W Sienkiewicz,H Stecewicz-* | 37 | WE | 3 | S | 6 | = | -600 | 69.44% | 56.41% | ||
L Rutkowski-H Stecewicz,*-W Sienkiewicz | 38 | WE | 5 | W | 5 | -1 | -100 | 11.11% | 52.64% | |||
7 | T Paluchowski-J Roszczenko,Z Kowalewski-* | 7 | WE | 6 | W | 7 | +1 | +1470 | 86.11% | 55.21% | ||
T Paluchowski-Z Kowalewski,*-J Roszczenko | 8 | WE | 4 | W | K | -1 | -50 | 8.33% | 51.86% | |||
8 | P Latała-A Balunowski,R Kruk-* | 15 | WE | 2 | S | 2 | +2 | -180 | 36.11% | 50.81% | ||
P Latała-R Kruk,*-A Balunowski | 16 | WE | 1 | W | 3 | +1 | +120 | 94.44% | 53.54% | |||
9 | J Gardocki-D Kozłowski,G Szarkanas-* | 23 | WE | 3 | W | 7 | -2 | -200 | 22.22% | 51.70% | ||
J Gardocki-G Szarkanas,*-D Kozłowski | 24 | WE | 3 | S | J | -1 | +50 | 41.67% | 51.14% | |||
10 | J Kowalewski-J Pęczkowski,B Szulejewski-* | 31 | WE | 3 | S | 5 | +1 | -170 | 63.89% | 51.81% | ||
J Kowalewski-B Szulejewski,*-J Pęczkowski | 32 | WE | 4 | E | 9 | -1 | -100 | 5.56% | 49.50% | |||
11 | M Hanusz-H Brodawski,H Medusheuski-* | 1 | WE | 4 | S | 6 | -1 | +50 | 91.06% | 51.48% | ||
M Hanusz-H Medusheuski,*-H Brodawski | 2 | WE | 3 | S | 7 | -1 | +100 | 66.67% | 52.17% | |||
12 | T Banach-J Galewski,D Hutnik-* | 9 | WE | 3 | N | K | = | -140 | 47.22% | 51.95% | ||
T Banach-D Hutnik,*-J Galewski | 10 | WE | 1 | S | J | +1 | -120 | 16.67% | 50.48% | |||
13 | M Krasowski-W Miłuński,Ł Sobkiewicz-* | 17 | WE | 3 | S | 2 | = | -140 | 5.56% | 48.69% | ||
M Krasowski-Ł Sobkiewicz,*-W Miłuński | 18 | WE | 3 | W | Q | -2 | -100 | 22.22% | 47.67% | |||
14 | P Klebanovich-Y Hardzei,A Tompolska-* | 25 | WE | 1 | N | 8 | +1 | -90 | 5.56% | 46.11% | ||
P Klebanovich-A Tompolska,*-Y Hardzei | 26 | WE | 4 | W | J | +3 | +710 | 50.00% | 46.25% | |||
15 | *-J Bojanowski,S Kopyt-M Hryszko | 33 | NS | 4 | N | 6 | = | +420 | 0.00% | 44.65% | ||
*-S Kopyt,M Hryszko-J Bojanowski | 34 | NS | 2 | S | Q | = | +120 | 50.00% | 44.83% | |||
16 | *-H Perkowska,W Burakowski-A Chayeuski | 3 | NS | 3 | E | 9 | -1 | +100 | 100.00% | 46.61% | ||
*-W Burakowski,A Chayeuski-H Perkowska | 4 | NS | 3 | W | 10 | -1 | +100 | 97.22% | 48.19% | |||
17 | *-R Kozłowski,B Mer-I Radziukevich | 11 | NS | 5 | N | 7 | = | +450 | 86.11% | 49.34% | ||
*-B Mer,I Radziukevich-R Kozłowski | 12 | NS | 4 | S | K | = | +620 | 86.11% | 50.42% | |||
18 | *-J Romot,T Zaleski-W Nazaruk | 19 | NS | 3 | S | K | +1 | +170 | 33.33% | 49.93% | ||
*-T Zaleski,W Nazaruk-J Romot | 20 | NS | 4 | N | Q | +1 | +650 | 86.11% | 50.94% | |||
19 | *-K Sawwa,J Gąsiorowski-S Pochodowicz | 27 | NS | 2 | S | 10 | +1 | +110 | 70.53% | 51.47% | ||
*-J Gąsiorowski,S Pochodowicz-K Sawwa | 28 | NS | 2 | E | Q | = | -90 | 55.56% | 51.58% | |||
SUMA: | 51.58% | |||||||||||
±: | ||||||||||||
WYNIK: | 51.58% | |||||||||||
MIEJSCE: | 29 |
Pary.4.1.0.23 ©Jan Romański'2005, strona wygenerowana 2016-10-23 o 17:15:39