Indywidualne MP - półfinał 321: K Obłój | ||||||||||||
runda | przeciwnicy | rozd. | linia | kont rakt | gra | wist | lew | zapis | % | wynik bieżący | ||
NS | WE | |||||||||||
1 | E Knapik-L Urbańczyk,Z Bandych-* | 15 | WE | 2 | W | K | = | +110 | 78.00% | 78.00% | ||
E Knapik-Z Bandych,*-L Urbańczyk | 16 | WE | 3 | S | 10 | -1 | +50 | 56.00% | 67.00% | |||
2 | J Wachnowski-D Bogucki,P Ilczuk-* | 23 | WE | 3 | W | K | +1 | +130 | 56.00% | 63.33% | ||
J Wachnowski-P Ilczuk,*-D Bogucki | 24 | WE | 6 | N | 6 | -1 | +50 | 84.00% | 68.50% | |||
3 | W Skowron-P Dybicz,Z Klimczak-* | 5 | WE | 2 | W | 5 | +2 | +170 | 76.00% | 70.00% | ||
W Skowron-Z Klimczak,*-P Dybicz | 6 | WE | 3 | E | 10 | = | +600 | 68.00% | 69.67% | |||
4 | K Buzała-P Chindelewicz,B Rakuzy-* | 13 | WE | PASS | 0 | 64.00% | 68.86% | |||||
K Buzała-B Rakuzy,*-P Chindelewicz | 14 | WE | 5 | N | A | +2 | -510 | 80.00% | 70.25% | |||
5 | E Nazaruk-A Maduzia,R Suder-* | 21 | WE | 3 | W | 4 | = | +140 | 64.00% | 69.56% | ||
E Nazaruk-R Suder,*-A Maduzia | 22 | WE | 5× | N | 6 | -1 | +100 | 56.00% | 68.20% | |||
6 | M Ilnicki-L Cegiel,J Skalda-* | 3 | WE | 2 | N | 7 | -1 | +50 | 54.00% | 66.91% | ||
M Ilnicki-J Skalda,*-L Cegiel | 4 | WE | 2 | S | Q | = | -120 | 44.00% | 65.00% | |||
7 | J Pawlikaniec-B Szulejewski,M Makatrewicz-* | 11 | WE | 5× | E | A | -1 | -100 | 33.36% | 62.57% | ||
J Pawlikaniec-M Makatrewicz,*-B Szulejewski | 12 | WE | 3 | E | K | = | +400 | 92.00% | 64.67% | |||
8 | J Kurianowicz-A Marcinowski,M Fechner-* | 19 | WE | 4 | N | 8 | = | -420 | 6.00% | 60.76% | ||
J Kurianowicz-M Fechner,*-A Marcinowski | 20 | WE | 2 | N | 8 | +3 | -200 | 26.00% | 58.59% | |||
9 | R Kłosiński-P Marcinowski,K Kopka-* | 1 | WE | 3 | E | Q | = | +400 | 42.00% | 57.61% | ||
R Kłosiński-K Kopka,*-P Marcinowski | 2 | WE | 2 | W | 6 | = | +110 | 56.00% | 57.52% | |||
10 | P Saliński-E Seichter,S Gołdyn-* | 9 | WE | 2 | S | 4 | +1 | -140 | 18.00% | 55.44% | ||
P Saliński-S Gołdyn,*-E Seichter | 10 | WE | 3 | N | Q | +2 | -200 | 68.00% | 56.07% | |||
11 | *-I Siemieniako,W Burakowski-J Brede | 17 | NS | 4 | S | Q | = | +420 | 52.00% | 55.87% | ||
*-W Burakowski,J Brede-I Siemieniako | 18 | NS | 3 | E | 8 | +1 | -430 | 56.00% | 55.88% | |||
12 | *-T Garbacik,R Gregorowicz-T Kiełbasa | 25 | NS | 5 | S | A | -1 | -50 | 22.00% | 54.41% | ||
*-R Gregorowicz,T Kiełbasa-T Garbacik | 26 | NS | 3 | E | 3 | -1 | +100 | 18.00% | 52.89% | |||
13 | *-S Wachel,J Wiese-L Warwocki | 7 | NS | 2 | S | 8 | -2 | -200 | 24.00% | 51.73% | ||
*-J Wiese,L Warwocki-S Wachel | 8 | NS | 3 | E | K | +1 | -430 | 48.00% | 51.59% | |||
SUMA: | 51.59% | |||||||||||
C-OVER: | 47.02% | |||||||||||
±: | ||||||||||||
WYNIK: | 50.07% | |||||||||||
MIEJSCE: | 53 |
Pary.4.1.0.23 ©Jan Romański'2005, strona wygenerowana 2017-07-23 o 10:43:25