| ROUND 4, SEGMENT 2, TABLE 2 | ||||||||||||||
| LATTERIA TINIS-STEINPOL I | VS | CONSUS Kalisz | ||||||||||||
| OPEN | CLOSED | |||||||||||||
| NS:M Witek-R Sakowicz | NS:P Walczak-P Ilczuk | |||||||||||||
| EW:J Makaruk-P Niedzielski | EW:P Miechowicz-M Urbański | |||||||||||||
| contr. | by | lead | tr. | score | brd# | contr. | by | lead | tr. | score | imps | TD | ||
| NS EW | NS EW | 28 | 18 | |||||||||||
4 | N |  7 | +2 | 680 | 13 | 4 | N | 7 | +2 | 680 | – | – | ||
5 × | E | A | -4 | 800 | 14 | 3 | N | J | -3 | -150 | 14 | |||
| 3 | S |  J | = | 600 | 15 | 3 | S | 5 | +1 | 630 | 1 | |||
| 2 | N | A | = | 90 | 16 | 3 | N | A | -2 | -100 | 5 | |||
| 2 | N | A | +1 | 140 | 17 | 2 | N | 4 | +2 | 170 | 1 | |||
| 3 | S | A | +1 | 130 | 18 | 3 | S | K | +1 | 130 | – | – | ||
| 2 | S | 2 | +1 | 140 | 19 | 2 | S | 2 | +3 | 200 | 2 | |||
| 4 | S | 10 | -1 | -100 | 20 | 3 | N | Q | +1 | 630 | 12 | |||
| 6 | S | 2 | +1 | 1460 | 21 | 7 | S | 5 | = | 2210 | 13 | |||
| 4 | S | A | = | 420 | 22 | 4 | S | A | = | 420 | – | – | ||
| 6 | S | Q | -1 | -100 | 23 | 4 | S | J | +2 | 680 | 13 | |||
| 5 | W | 4 | = | -400 | 24 | 3 | W | 5 | = | -400 | – | – | ||
| Click on board number above to see it on the right. Click table number on the right to see its travellers. | IMP: | 47 | 60 | |||||||||||
| RESULT: | 7.05 | 12.95 | ||||||||||||
Board analysis by DeepFinesse, ©William Bailey'1999 | ||||||||||||||