116: M Wręczycki
rakt
bieżący
×
6
8
76K×279J×8×810×AK×7QJ2K3A633Q8×Q104A332K542837AA2Q5×AQ3×JJKA5K××K4K49A| Finał GPP Open 116: M Wręczycki | ||||||||||||
| runda | przeciwnicy | rozd. | linia | kont rakt | gra | wist | lew | zapis | % | wynik bieżący | ||
| NS | WE | |||||||||||
| 1 | S Gołębiowski-*,T Winciorek-M Krupowicz | 1 | NS | 3× | S | 6 | -1 | -100 | 21.43% | 21.43% | ||
| S Gołębiowski-*,T Winciorek-M Krupowicz | 2 | NS | 4 | E | 8 | +3 | -510 | 85.71% | 53.57% | |||
| 2 | S Gołębiowski-*,I Kowalczyk-T Wiśniewski | 3 | NS | 1 | S | 7 | +2 | +150 | 85.71% | 64.29% | ||
| S Gołębiowski-*,I Kowalczyk-T Wiśniewski | 4 | NS | 2 | E | 6 | = | -110 | 14.29% | 51.79% | |||
| 3 | S Gołębiowski-*,S Kowalczyk-J Sucharkiewicz | 5 | NS | 3 | W | K | +3 | -490 | 28.57% | 47.14% | ||
| S Gołębiowski-*,S Kowalczyk-J Sucharkiewicz | 6 | NS | 5× | S | 2 | -1 | -100 | 0.00% | 39.29% | |||
| 4 | S Gołębiowski-*,M Klukowski-P Tuczyński | 7 | NS | 3 | S | 7 | +3 | +690 | 100.00% | 47.96% | ||
| S Gołębiowski-*,M Klukowski-P Tuczyński | 8 | NS | 4 | W | 9 | = | -420 | 21.43% | 44.64% | |||
| 5 | S Gołębiowski-*,P Zawada-W Strzemecki | 9 | NS | 4 | N | J | = | +420 | 42.86% | 44.44% | ||
| S Gołębiowski-*,P Zawada-W Strzemecki | 10 | NS | 4× | W | 8 | -5 | +1400 | 100.00% | 50.00% | |||
| 6 | S Gołębiowski-*,B Gierulski-J Skrzypczak | 11 | NS | 4× | S | 8 | -1 | -100 | 21.43% | 47.40% | ||
| S Gołębiowski-*,B Gierulski-J Skrzypczak | 12 | NS | 2 | W | 10 | +2 | -170 | 85.71% | 50.60% | |||
| 7 | S Gołębiowski-*,B Chmurski-S Pająk | 13 | NS | 5× | W | A | = | -750 | 0.00% | 46.70% | ||
| S Gołębiowski-*,B Chmurski-S Pająk | 14 | NS | 3 | N | K | -3 | -150 | 14.29% | 44.39% | |||
| 8 | S Gołębiowski-*,D Filipowicz-K Martens | 15 | NS | 1× | W | 7 | -2 | +300 | 92.86% | 47.62% | ||
| S Gołębiowski-*,D Filipowicz-K Martens | 16 | NS | 3 | W | Q | = | -600 | 42.86% | 47.32% | |||
| 9 | S Gołębiowski-*,P Wiankowski-P Nawrocki | 17 | NS | 4 | W | J | +1 | -450 | 35.71% | 46.64% | ||
| S Gołębiowski-*,P Wiankowski-P Nawrocki | 18 | NS | 5 | S | 2 | +1 | +680 | 42.86% | 46.43% | |||
| 10 | S Gołębiowski-*,M Nowosadzki-J Kalita | 19 | NS | 3 | E | K | +3 | -690 | 0.00% | 43.98% | ||
| S Gołębiowski-*,M Nowosadzki-J Kalita | 20 | NS | 1 | S | 3 | -2 | -200 | 14.29% | 42.50% | |||
| 11 | S Gołębiowski-*,S Niajko-Ł Witkowski | 21 | NS | 5 | N | A | +1 | +680 | 64.29% | 43.54% | ||
| S Gołębiowski-*,S Niajko-Ł Witkowski | 22 | NS | 3 | S | 6 | -2 | -100 | 42.86% | 43.51% | |||
| 12 | S Gołębiowski-*,A Wujków-J Śmieszek | 23 | NS | 3 | S | 3 | = | +110 | 71.43% | 44.72% | ||
| S Gołębiowski-*,A Wujków-J Śmieszek | 24 | NS | 6 | E | 3 | +1 | -1010 | 35.71% | 44.35% | |||
| 13 | S Gołębiowski-*,W Starkowski-P Tuszyński | 25 | NS | 5 | N | Q | -1 | -50 | 35.71% | 44.00% | ||
| S Gołębiowski-*,W Starkowski-P Tuszyński | 26 | NS | 2 | E | 8 | -2 | +200 | 78.57% | 45.33% | |||
| 14 | S Gołębiowski-*,B Szulejewski-P Janiszewski | 27 | NS | 4× | E | Q | = | -510 | 0.00% | 43.65% | ||
| S Gołębiowski-*,B Szulejewski-P Janiszewski | 28 | NS | 3 | S | 10 | = | +140 | 50.00% | 43.88% | |||
| 15 | S Gołębiowski-*,P Zatorski-E Vainikonis | 29 | NS | 3 | S | 4 | +2 | +660 | 85.71% | 45.32% | ||
| S Gołębiowski-*,P Zatorski-E Vainikonis | 30 | NS | 2 | S | A | = | +110 | 57.14% | 45.71% | |||
| 16 | P Zawada-W Strzemecki,S Gołębiowski-* | 1 | WE | 2 | N | 3 | +1 | -140 | 28.57% | 45.16% | ||
| P Zawada-W Strzemecki,S Gołębiowski-* | 2 | WE | 4 | W | 3 | = | +130 | 57.14% | 45.54% | |||
| 17 | M Nowosadzki-J Kalita,S Gołębiowski-* | 3 | WE | 4 | N | 2 | +1 | -450 | 35.71% | 45.24% | ||
| M Nowosadzki-J Kalita,S Gołębiowski-* | 4 | WE | 2 | E | K | +2 | +170 | 7.14% | 44.12% | |||
| 18 | S Gołębiowski-*,P Zatorski-E Vainikonis | 5 | NS | 1 | N | 5 | +2 | +150 | 100.00% | 45.71% | ||
| S Gołębiowski-*,P Zatorski-E Vainikonis | 6 | NS | 2 | N | 4 | -2 | -100 | 42.86% | 45.63% | |||
| 19 | S Kowalczyk-J Sucharkiewicz,S Gołębiowski-* | 7 | WE | 3 | W | 2 | = | +600 | 64.29% | 46.14% | ||
| S Kowalczyk-J Sucharkiewicz,S Gołębiowski-* | 8 | WE | 2 | N | 8 | +2 | -170 | 35.71% | 45.86% | |||
| 20 | S Gołębiowski-*,B Szulejewski-P Janiszewski | 9 | NS | 3 | E | 3 | +2 | -660 | 35.71% | 45.60% | ||
| S Gołębiowski-*,B Szulejewski-P Janiszewski | 10 | NS | 4 | S | 7 | = | +620 | 28.57% | 45.18% | |||
| 21 | D Filipowicz-K Martens,S Gołębiowski-* | 11 | WE | 5 | E | A | -1 | -50 | 7.14% | 44.25% | ||
| D Filipowicz-K Martens,S Gołębiowski-* | 12 | WE | 4 | W | A | +1 | +450 | 57.14% | 44.56% | |||
| 22 | T Winciorek-M Krupowicz,S Gołębiowski-* | 13 | WE | 2 | S | 2 | -3 | +300 | 92.86% | 45.68% | ||
| T Winciorek-M Krupowicz,S Gołębiowski-* | 14 | WE | 3 | E | Q | -3 | -150 | 17.86% | 45.05% | |||
| 23 | S Gołębiowski-*,A Wujków-J Śmieszek | 15 | NS | 4 | E | 5 | +1 | -460 | 50.00% | 45.16% | ||
| S Gołębiowski-*,A Wujków-J Śmieszek | 16 | NS | 5× | N | A | -1 | -100 | 57.14% | 45.42% | |||
| 24 | S Gołębiowski-*,S Niajko-Ł Witkowski | 17 | NS | 4 | W | Q | -1 | +50 | 85.71% | 46.28% | ||
| S Gołębiowski-*,S Niajko-Ł Witkowski | 18 | NS | 2 | S | 3 | +1 | +140 | 71.43% | 46.80% | |||
| 25 | P Wiankowski-P Nawrocki,S Gołębiowski-* | 19 | WE | 5× | E | J | -2 | -500 | 50.00% | 46.87% | ||
| P Wiankowski-P Nawrocki,S Gołębiowski-* | 20 | WE | 4 | N | J | = | -630 | 42.86% | 46.79% | |||
| 26 | S Gołębiowski-*,B Gierulski-J Skrzypczak | 21 | NS | 2 | N | K | = | +110 | 57.14% | 46.99% | ||
| S Gołębiowski-*,B Gierulski-J Skrzypczak | 22 | NS | 5 | W | A | +1 | -620 | 28.57% | 46.63% | |||
| 27 | S Gołębiowski-*,W Starkowski-P Tuszyński | 23 | NS | 4 | N | 5 | -1 | -100 | 50.00% | 46.70% | ||
| S Gołębiowski-*,W Starkowski-P Tuszyński | 24 | NS | 1 | E | K | -1 | +50 | 7.14% | 45.97% | |||
| 28 | S Gołębiowski-*,M Klukowski-P Tuczyński | 25 | NS | 1×× | S | K | +2 | +960 | 100.00% | 46.95% | ||
| S Gołębiowski-*,M Klukowski-P Tuczyński | 26 | NS | 3 | S | 4 | -1 | -100 | 57.14% | 47.13% | |||
| 29 | B Chmurski-S Pająk,S Gołębiowski-* | 27 | WE | 4 | E | K | = | +420 | 78.57% | 47.68% | ||
| B Chmurski-S Pająk,S Gołębiowski-* | 28 | WE | 1 | N | 4 | = | -90 | 71.43% | 48.09% | |||
| 30 | I Kowalczyk-T Wiśniewski,S Gołębiowski-* | 29 | WE | 2 | W | 9 | +1 | +140 | 64.29% | 48.37% | ||
| I Kowalczyk-T Wiśniewski,S Gołębiowski-* | 30 | WE | 4 | E | A | -1 | -50 | 85.71% | 48.99% | |||
| SUMA: | 48.99% | |||||||||||
| C-OVER: | 9343.00% | |||||||||||
| ±: | ||||||||||||
| WYNIK: | 60.04% | |||||||||||
| MIEJSCE: | 12 | |||||||||||
Pary.4.1.0.23 ©Jan Romański'2005, strona wygenerowana 2014-01-08 o 15:07:42